<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Software Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://swtools.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://swtools.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Do one thing well, and work together.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 06:04:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Software Craftsmanship and Programmers&#8217; Status by Notional Slurry &#187; links for 2009-04-06</title>
		<link>http://swtools.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/software-craftsmanship-and-programmers-status/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Notional Slurry &#187; links for 2009-04-06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 06:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swtools.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-384</guid>
		<description>[...] Software Craftsmanship and Programmers’ Status « Software Tools &quot;If software craftsmen would be professionals (note above how Naur separates us from engineers), we should compare existing computer and information science codes of ethics, for example a 1998 Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice (SECEPP), to a draft Software Craftsman’s Ethic (SCE, in bold face). Here I roughly group practices by similar intent: the last two groups catch all unmatched practices&#8230;.&quot; (tags: design programming craftsmanship professionalism guild-life) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Software Craftsmanship and Programmers’ Status « Software Tools &quot;If software craftsmen would be professionals (note above how Naur separates us from engineers), we should compare existing computer and information science codes of ethics, for example a 1998 Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice (SECEPP), to a draft Software Craftsman’s Ethic (SCE, in bold face). Here I roughly group practices by similar intent: the last two groups catch all unmatched practices&#8230;.&quot; (tags: design programming craftsmanship professionalism guild-life) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My experience with Master Craftsman Teams by Software Craftsmanship and Programmers&#8217; Status &#171; Software Tools</title>
		<link>http://swtools.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/my-experience-with-master-craftsman-teams/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Software Craftsmanship and Programmers&#8217; Status &#171; Software Tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swtools.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-382</guid>
		<description>[...] a person progresses (or not) through a career, but in my experience this classification applies between a person and each of many projects. Apprentice. The apprentices write a significant amount of code—most of which is discarded by the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a person progresses (or not) through a career, but in my experience this classification applies between a person and each of many projects. Apprentice. The apprentices write a significant amount of code—most of which is discarded by the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
